Job Board Highlights
New Conservation Documents

via ConserveOnline connecting conservation practitioners worldwide

Announcements

Looking for Contributors -Contact us, if you would like to profile new studies related to your area of interest.

Sign up for our newsletter - We profile the latest conservation studies from over 100 journals plus new funding opportunities... straight to your email.

Wednesday
Sep072011

Poverty and national parks relationship debunked by new study

These children live alongside Kibale National Park, Uganda, seen in the background. Although poverty is common at the edge of many national parks, this new study shows that a park may actually attenuate poverty rather than enhance it. Photo: Lisa NaughtonIf so many poor people live around national parks in developing countries, does that mean that these parks are contributing to their poverty?

Yes, according to the conventional wisdom, but no, according to a 10-year study of people living around Kibale National Park in Uganda that was published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"Often people have lamented that the poorest of the poor live on the edge of the parks, and the assumption is that it's the parks that are keeping people poor," says Lisa Naughton, a professor of geography at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The issue matters, she says, because "people say we can't afford to protect biodiversity" if that inflicts further economic hardship on people who are already poor.

To explore the relationship of parks, poverty and biodiversity conservation, Naughton and colleagues began monitoring 252 families living within three miles of Kibale National Park in 1996.  The general trend during 10 years was toward greater prosperity, as measured by access to clean drinking water, ownership of more livestock, and living under an improved roof rather than the traditional thatch.

"Most of the households came out ahead, are a lot better off than when we started," says Naughton, who has worked in Uganda for more than 20 years. "I go back every couple of years, and people are generally optimistic, some say they never imagined life would be this good."

But 10 percent of the families in the original study sold or lost their land and moved away, which indicates severe poverty, says co-author Jennifer Alix-Garcia. "The sale of land does not sound so terrible to us, but in Uganda, land is your most productive asset, and once you sell it, you don’t have anything to rely on."

Although one finds a disproportionate presence of the very poor at the park edge today, more of their very poor counterparts who lived further away were forced to sell or give up their land, Alix-Garcia says.

"Apparently the park provides a source of insurance; they can hunt, or sell firewood or thatch from the park. It's misleading. If you look, you see more poor people living near the park. But when you look at the change in assets, you see that the poor people who live next to the park have lost less than poor people who live farther away," she says.

And that suggests that the park is unlikely to explain the increased poverty among its close neighbors. 

Parks, landscapes, societies and economies vary widely, and so it's hard to know how well the results will generalize, Naughton admits. But she says the study was one of the first to look at parks and poverty over the long term, and the results do undermine the conventional wisdom – that national parks are to blame for the poverty found at their borders.

 "If you are concerned about the welfare of the people who live around parks, don’t assume that it is the park that is trapping them in poverty. Instead of only looking at the park, turn around and look in the other direction. Land is becoming scarce and most public forests have been cleared or privatized. There are many other factors, it's not just the park," Naughton says.

By looking at changes over time, Naughton adds, it's easier to understand the real course of events.  "There is a lot of research looking at poverty in parks, but much of it amounts to looking just at the present-day location of poverty. For 10 years, we have been looking at the changes: What were the starting conditions? What were the ending conditions? And did the park matter?"

--Reprinted from University of Wisconsin

Lisa Naughton-Treves, Jennifer Alix-Garcia, Colin A. Chapman. Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Traps Special Feature: Lessons about parks and poverty from a decade of forest loss and economic growth around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011.

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive new articles to your inbox
Email:

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (13)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Poverty and national parks relationship debunked by new study - Conservation News - Conservation Maven
  • Response
    Response: bradley kurgis
    Poverty and national parks relationship debunked by new study - Conservation News - Conservation Maven
  • Response
    Response: judge ray harding
    Poverty and national parks relationship debunked by new study - Conservation News - Conservation Maven
  • Response
    Response: judge ray harding
    Poverty and national parks relationship debunked by new study - Conservation News - Conservation Maven
  • Response
    Response: Judge Ray Harding
    Poverty and national parks relationship debunked by new study - Conservation News - Conservation Maven
  • Response
    Response: Judge Ray Harding
    Poverty and national parks relationship debunked by new study - Conservation News - Conservation Maven
  • Response
    Response: judge Ray Harding
    Poverty and national parks relationship debunked by new study - Conservation News - Conservation Maven
  • Response
    当前位置 / 压瓦机|折弯机|剪板机|角驰Ⅲ|c型钢机|840压瓦机|860压瓦机|900压瓦机|彩钢瓦设备|双层压瓦机|天槽地沟机|三 压瓦机 维扣板机|泡沫切割机|复合板流水线_金利压瓦机械厂 > 技术文档 > 泊头金利对彩钢压瓦机的简介说明 信息来 折弯机 源:压瓦机 发布日期:2015-03-16 14:37 点击: 180 次 泊头金利对彩钢压瓦机的简介说明 剪板机
  • Response
    彩钢瓦生产设备机械厂家联系人: 手机:13832771638王女士 ,192护栏板设备; 151337 彩钢瓦生产设备 11101祁先生 QQ: ,泊头金辉压瓦机械设备厂92-337.5-675角驰成型机; 59458991 座机:0317-80861 192护栏板设备 88 传真:0317-8086188 ...
  • Response
    Response: 咬口机
    .C型钢机的产品主要用途及产品特点 C型钢机 .C型钢机的产品主要用途及产品特点。经该C型钢机辊轧的C型檩 C型钢机 条成品具有良好的抗弯抗压性能,平直度好、全自动定长切割、自动冲孔、自动化程度高,安装快捷方便。 产品可作为大中型工业民用建筑的主体受力结构,如厂房、 仓库、机车库、飞机库、展览馆、影剧院、体育场馆、集 C型钢机 市花棚的屋面承重荷载和墙面支撑。 该机主要由被动放料架、放料架底座、进料导入平台、整平装置、成型主机、冲孔装置、成型切断装置、液压站、电脑控制柜等几部分组成。  
  • Response
    840A型压瓦机使用过程简单介绍 840A型压瓦机是湿法生 压瓦机 产琉璃瓦时用来对真空螺旋挤出机挤制并切割后的粗瓦坯进行精确定型压制的液压压力机。自动压瓦机可单独安装使用 ,但需人工装坯,卸坯,亦可配置自动装料 压瓦机 架和卸坯机械手与挤出机、切瓦机,送坯机以及瓦托输送线等组成瓦坯生产流水线,完全不需要人 工进行操作。 我国琉璃瓦行业所使用的自动压瓦机最先都是从德国,意大利,法国等国引进,2006年湖南湘潭某陶机厂成功发开国产化的自动压瓦机,与进 口产品相比,在 压瓦机 细
  • Response
    Response: 高速护栏板机
    C型钢机工艺流程和改进完成的方法 C型钢机工艺流程:带钢从设备的尾部送入,经过各种压辊压制成C型钢从头部送出。传统工艺中,C C型钢机 型钢压制成型后需要人工进行定长切断,再搬运到 C型钢机 冲孔设备按照客户要求的尺寸打孔,生产不能连续,效率不高。经过逐步改进生产工艺,最终实现了全工艺过程自动控制,飞跃性地提高了生产效率,增加了客户设备的技术含量和附加值。 改进过程分四步完成: 第一步改进,增加长度测量装置和飞锯,当压制长度达到设定的长度时飞锯动作,自动切断型材。 第二步改进,加一台打边 自动控制 孔
  • Response
    C型钢机设备的结构及技术参数 C型钢机设备设计结构合理,实用效率高,能很好提高生产能力,减少劳动力该设备全部采用 C型钢机 液压动力系统,从而使该机器更便于操作。液压系统采用水冷散热连续生产。 该机由上料架,送料辊,校平辊,成型辊轮,电脑控制系统液压传动,冲孔,液压扭断 C型钢机 装置组成。电脑控制系统采用日本三菱可编程序控制器。液压传动用国内最先进的名牌产品。具有传动平稳,长度定位精密。冲孔速度快,较普通电机驱动速度提高一倍以上。 本机器主要特点是变换C型钢 C型钢 型

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.